FAQ
Questions about private company boards
Straight answers to the questions founders, chairs and directors ask most — from the first quasi-board to the workings of the meeting itself.
Getting started
When should a founder set up a board?
Earlier than many think. It is hardly ever too early for a quasi-board: one, two or three people who meet you in a fixed rhythm and have permission to challenge you. I call this micro governance — the smallest unit of board work, long before a formal board (read the essay: https://makeboardswork.substack.com/p/you-dont-need-a-board-you-need-micro). The discipline of preparing for someone else is worth as much as the added perspective. And by the time your growing company requires a formal board, you will already know how to use one.
Watch Marc answer this — 2:00
How do I find my first board members?
Look for the person you would call with a sleepless-night problem, not the biggest name available. The first seats should cover what you lack — stage experience, industry access, financial depth — and bring the spine to disagree with you. A joint trust basis is key. A name that impresses your investors but stays silent in the room fills a seat and adds nothing.
Composition
How many people should a private company board have?
Fewer than you think. Three to five engaged directors beat seven polite ones; every seat above that adds coordination cost faster than it adds insight. Less is more — the goal is a working team, not a parliament.
Why appoint independent directors?
Because founders and investors, or family members, both sit in the room with an agenda, and someone has to be free of one. Independents ask the questions insiders have stopped seeing, bridge conflicts between founder/CEO and investors/family, and are often the difference between a board that supervises and a board that supports, and challenges.
How long should a board member serve?
As long as they fit the company's next stage — not its last one. Boards should be built dynamically: who do we need now, and who next? A respectful, planned rotation beats seats held out of loyalty, and everyone serves better knowing the seat is not forever. Define board terms in advance — in dynamic environments possibly as short as one year, always with the option to renew. Renewal then becomes a deliberate choice rather than a lazy default.
Watch Marc answer this — 1:22
The chair
What does a board chair actually do?
The chair carries the board's rhythm: the agenda, the preparation, the quality of discussion in the room, and the follow-through after it. A good chair is a lightning rod — absorbing tension between founder/CEO, investors/family owners and management so the board can do its work. The chair leads the board, the CEO the business. It is a craft, not a ceremonial title.
Should the CEO chair the board?
It happens often, and it can work — but it concentrates enormous power in one person and makes honest challenge harder. An independent chair releases tension the CEO-chair cannot, precisely because they are not a player in their own game. If the roles are combined, be deliberate about which hat is on at any moment.
Behavior in the room
How do you build trust in a board?
Deliberately, and before you need it. Trust is a bank account: it must be funded in calm times — through time spent together, transparency, and non-business moments — because it cannot be built in a crisis. The more urgently you need it, the less able you are to create it. And trust has two layers: personal trust — I know you, I like you — and professional trust — I value your judgement. A board needs both; which of the two requires the more deliberate building depends on the board you have.
How do you keep egos in check in the boardroom?
Name it as the standard: check your ego at the door. Nobody reaches a boardroom without one; the discipline is subordinating it to the primacy of the company — company first, then board, then director. All directors must internalize that it is far more important to get it right, collectively, than to be right, individually. Chairs set this tone by example, and by celebrating contributions rather than contributors.
Special constellations
What is different about family-business boards?
The shareholders sit at your dinner table, so governance and family dynamics blend in ways no charter fully separates. Personal trust is usually abundant; professional trust may quietly be in doubt — a sibling trusted at the dinner table can still be questioned in the boardroom. The reverse flow matters just as much: family issues can permeate the boardroom, and the chair must actively manage that boundary. The best family boards balance tradition against reinvention and use outside directors to say what family members cannot. The mechanics are the same as any board; the emotional stakes are higher.
How should investors behave on a board?
As board members first and shareholders second — the fiduciary duty runs to the company, not the fund. The best investor-directors bring pattern recognition and their network's weight, and they know the difference between supporting a company and defending a position. The worst treat the board as a reporting line.
How do you handle conflicts of interest on a board?
Expect them — financing rounds, exits, follow-on investments and executive changes all create them. The unglamorous mechanics work: name the conflict early, get it on the table before it hardens, and let the un-conflicted decide. Independent directors are gold here: free of the economic stakes, they can name the conflict others prefer not to see. What kills boards is not the conflict itself but pretending it is not there.
Watch Marc answer this — 2:19
The working rhythm
What belongs in a board pack?
Documents that create reflection, not decks that perform reporting. Docs beat slides: a well-written memo forces clear thinking from management and lets directors arrive with formed questions. Reporting still matters, of course — it just need not consume the meeting. Much of it belongs in the pre-read, and some boards separate it entirely: at Babbel, Markus Witte complements board meetings with a short monthly update call led by the CFO — an earnings-call-style briefing that keeps directors informed and frees the meeting for real discussion. If the pack merely reports, the meeting will merely listen.
Watch Marc answer this — 2:39
What should happen after a board meeting?
The meeting is one stage, not the end. Decisions need owners and deadlines, the wider team deserves to hear what the board discussed, and the board itself should ask what to improve — a brief self-assessment (and an after-action review for more extraordinary events) each time. After the meeting is before the meeting.
Assessing and improving
How do you know whether your board is working?
Ask it. A short self-assessment at the end of each meeting — a few qualitative or quantitative questions — plus an annual deeper look is enough to surface most problems. The obstacle is rarely method; it is the courage to hold up the mirror.
The fundamentals
What makes a private company board effective?
An effective private company board combines the right composition, genuine psychological safety and robust trust, and disciplined meeting preparation and facilitation. Directors receive materials early enough to think before the meeting, disagreement surfaces openly in the room rather than in the corridor afterwards, roles between board and management are explicit, and discussion reliably converts into recorded, owned decisions.
Why do most private company boards underperform?
Most private company boards underperform because they are treated as a formality rather than a resource. Founders often see the board as a control mechanism imposed by investors, investors often use it as oversight, and neither side invests in the dialogue. Families often do not separate family and business governance. The result is a meeting that reports the past instead of shaping the future.
What is psychological safety in the boardroom?
Psychological safety in the boardroom means that any director can raise a concern, admit uncertainty or challenge the CEO without damaging their standing. Without it, boards default to polite agreement and the real conversation happens privately afterwards, or not at all. Which is where the real, sometimes fatal risks lurk.
Watch Marc answer this — 2:02
What is the difference between an advisory board and a fiduciary board?
A fiduciary board has legal authority and legal duties: it can hire and fire the CEO and is accountable to shareholders. An advisory board has no statutory authority and no legal liability — it exists to counsel management. In practice, though, many advisory boards — especially in VC-backed companies — do carry formal authority through private contracts such as shareholders' agreements, sitting somewhere between the two pure forms. Many private companies benefit from an advisory board well before they need a fiduciary one.
How often should a private company board meet?
Most private company boards meet four to six times a year, with additional sessions when something material is in play. Meeting frequency matters far less than meeting quality: four well-prepared meetings with real dialogue create more value than twelve status updates that review numbers everyone has already seen. In fast-moving companies, a tighter rhythm can pay off. Christian Leybold, founding partner at Headline, puts it memorably: “With a quarterly board meeting rhythm, the learning curve starts afresh every time. The founder must get us all back into the movie. Hence, I prefer a monthly rhythm, where we all keep the movie present.”
Who should sit on a private company board?
A strong private company board mixes perspectives the management team does not already have — operational experience at the next stage of scale, relevant sector knowledge, and at least one genuinely independent voice with no economic stake in the outcome. Very many entrepreneurs have told me they want at least one director who has “been there, done that” — someone who gets the emotional rollercoaster, and with that allows them to be authentic. Composition should be revisited as the company changes stage.
What is board observation?
A board observer attends board meetings without a vote and without a formal mandate. Most commonly this is a contractually agreed observer seat: an investor representative, a prospective director being groomed for a full seat, or an executive invited for specific topics — giving access and perspective without enlarging the formal board. Used well, observers add context and eyes; used carelessly, they crowd the room. A rarer, deliberate variant is observation for the board's own development: an experienced outsider watches how the board actually works and gives the chair and CEO a candid, confidential read afterwards.
How do you prepare for a board meeting?
Effective board preparation means materials circulated far enough in advance that directors can form a view before the room, an agenda that allocates most time to discussions and decisions rather than reporting, and an explicit statement of what each item needs — information, discussion or a decision. Ideally, a certain type of facilitation style per agenda topic is used. The chair sets the standard and enforces it.
Get in touch
Still have a question?
If your question isn't answered here, send it over — Marc reads every email.
Get in touch